Unraveling Maladaptive Fusion: The Root of Rigidity

 

At the core of many emotional challenges lies Maladaptive Fusion — the intricate, often invisible weaving together of psychological drivers that traps us in inflexible patterns. This fusion acts like an emotional cement, hardening our responses and limiting our ability to adapt. By understanding how Maladaptive Fusion operates structurally within the psyche, the CEF offers a powerful key to loosen these bonds and restore emotional agility, opening the door to renewed mental and emotional health.

Breaking Free: Cultivating Emotional Flexibility

Discover how the Ten-Factor Architecture enhances the CORE EMOTION FRAMEWORK (CEF) by providing a scientifically grounded approach to emotional regulation, psychological resilience, and volitional control. Learn how Maladaptive Fusion—rigid entanglements of core psychological drivers—contributes to compulsive behavior, emotional stagnation, and mental health challenges. By integrating Head, Heart, and Gut centers, the CEF offers a transformative path to self-awareness, emotional flexibility, and lasting well-being. Whether you're a therapist, coach, or individual seeking personal growth, this framework delivers actionable insights for overcoming emotional rigidity and cultivating authentic self-determination.

Sensing and visualizing
Computing and anlyzing
deciding and realizing
expand and include
contract and precise
perform and excel
organize and manage
clap appreciate and enjoy
boost and act
surrender and relax
surrender and relax

Unlocking Core Rigidity: The Structural Diagnosis of Compulsion and Psychological Inflexibility for the CORE EMOTION FRAMEWORK (CEF)

 

 

Introduction: Bridging Competency Gaps with Causal Etiology

 

The CORE EMOTION FRAMEWORK (CEF) defines emotional competence through its Emotion Utilization Model (EUM), viewing emotions as fundamental "powers to harness" for effective action.1 To elevate the CEF beyond defining

what skills are required, this analysis integrates a structural psychological model that diagnoses the core causal mechanism of functional failure. This model identifies ten dialectical Core Psychological Drivers across the CEF’s Head, Heart, and Gut centers.2 Human dysfunction is understood not as skill deficiency, but as Maladaptive Fusion—a structural rigidity among these Drivers that leads directly to behavioral compulsion and entrenched Psychological Inflexibility (PI).3 By grounding this pathology in empirical science (ACT, ERP, SDT), the CEF gains the critical diagnostic depth needed to address the root cause of psychological rigidity.

 

 

 

Part I: The Foundational Ten-Factor Driver Architecture

 

The efficacy of the CEF rests on its tripartite architecture of control—Cognition (Head), Emotion (Heart), and Impulse (Gut).1 This structure provides the necessary granularity for the EUM to effectively map psychological resources.2

 

 

1.1. High-Resolution Mapping of the Core Drivers

 

The ten Core Psychological Drivers, the fundamental components of the psyche, are categorized by the functional center they serve:

 

  • Head Center (Cognition): This center embodies Integrated Judgment and Executive Function (EF).4 Its core drivers, Sensing (initial perception) Calculating (in-depth analysis) and Deciding (ending summary and direction), form the basis of Cognitive Reappraisal (CR)—the mechanism by which the mind objectively modifies affective input.6
     
  • Heart Center (Connection): This affective domain manages emotional responses and relational capacity, including the dialectical drivers Expanding (Approach/Relatedness), Constricting (Restraint/Inhibitory Control) and Achieving (Performance and willing to excel).8
     
  • Gut Center (Action/Impulse): This center is the engine of Volitional Control and defines the motivation-action dialectic: Boosting (Assertiveness/Autonomy) and Accepting (Receptivity/Relatedness).9 When the motivational factor meets the Heart Emotion of Achieving, it is acompanied by the wings of Arranging (directing and prioritizing) and Appreciating (enjoying, seeing beauty and getting along).2

 

 

1.2. The Scientific Basis of Cognitive Governance

 

The principle that Cognition governs Affect is validated by the mechanism of Cognitive Reappraisal (CR).6 This process relies on the detached, objective processing capacity of the Head Center, which is analogous to the role of the Prefrontal Cortex (PFC).10 This structural clarity confirms that effective self-regulation is achieved through cognitive flexibility and high-quality processing, rather than coercive force.11

 

 

 

Part II: The Etiology of Failure: Diagnosing Rigidity

 

This structural analysis provides the etiological data necessary to diagnose failure at the root level—the breakdown of the internal architecture.

 

 

2.1. Maladaptive Fusion as Structural Breakdown

 

The central pathological state, Rigidity (stubbornness)2, is the manifestation of Psychological Inflexibility (PI).12 This PI is caused by Maladaptive Fusion2—where Core Drivers are cemented together, operating as a chronic block.3 This pathological process aligns with Cognitive Fusion in ACT14, where an individual treats subjective thoughts, such as perfectionistic demands from the Constricting Driver, as objective truth, thereby preventing flexible action.14 Neuroscientific research confirms that this rigid linking of psychological functions, known as

over-coupling or dysconnectivity in frontoparietal networks, is a transdiagnostic marker of severe psychopathology16, underscoring the necessity for functional untangling as the primary therapeutic goal.2

 

 

2.2. The Compulsive Feedback Loop and Response Prevention

 

Maladaptive Fusion directly generates the Compulsive Feedback Loop2, which mirrors the pathology of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD).13 The compulsive action, intended to relieve anxiety from an obsession, paradoxically reinforces the underlying alarm system, intensifying the certainty of future compulsion.3 The therapeutic strategy derived from this model—

interrupting the compulsion2—is the core principle of

Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) therapy.20 ERP is a behavioral intervention that structurally breaks the maladaptive cycle by training the individual to resist the compulsive urge and tolerate the associated anxiety.21

 

 

 

Part III: Optimization of Motivation: From Compulsion to Self-Determination

 

The framework clarifies that psychological vitality depends on the quality of motivation, aligning the CEF's Action Drivers with Self-Determination Theory (SDT) to cultivate intrinsic drive.22

 

 

3.1. Extrinsic Compulsion vs. Healthy Striving

 

Compulsion is defined by the rigid insistence on flawless execution, aligning with Maladaptive Perfectionism (setting unrealistic goals motivated by fear of failure and harsh self-criticism).24 This is an expression of Extrinsic Motivation, where performance is focused on external validation or preventing scorn, which reduces intrinsic satisfaction and increases vulnerability to distress.11 The framework promotes

Healthy Striving—effort motivated by Intrinsic Drive (mastery and enjoyment of the process).24 This requires decoupling effort from the ego's need to control specific outcomes, as success "cannot be forced".2

 

 

3.2. Assertiveness and Receptivity: The SDT Dialectic

 

The ultimate goal of psychological maturity is Autonomous Balance—a flexible equilibrium between the Impulse Drivers, Boosting (Assertiveness/Autonomy) and Accepting (Receptivity/Relatedness).9 This balance allows an individual to maintain high effort while exercising humility and acceptance toward uncontrollable external results2, embodying the optimal configuration for wellness confirmed by SDT research.8 Pathology (Rigidity) is tied to the thwarting of these needs.8 When Assertiveness becomes rigid, it coerces behavior and thwarts genuine Autonomy.9

 

 

 

Part IV: Strategic Enhancement Protocols for the CEF

 

This structural analysis yields definitive, high-fidelity strategies to transform the CEF into a causal and prescriptive framework for optimal human capabilities.

 

  • Integrate Structural Diagnostics: The CEF must implement a quantitative Fusion Index (FI) to calculate the degree of Maladaptive Fusion between dialectical Core Drivers (e.g., Constricting and Boosting).3 This metric provides a superior, causal diagnostic indicator of Psychological Inflexibility (PI)12, enabling the CEF to identify the root cause of chronic behavioral deficits.
     

  • Mandate ERP Protocols for Compulsion: For clients identified with high Fusion and Compulsion scores2, intervention should prioritize Response Prevention (ERP) methodology.20 The CEF must utilize this structural intervention—training clients to resist the compulsive urge and tolerate the associated anxiety—as the most effective means to achieve functional untangling of the cemented Core Drivers.29
     
  • Qualitative Assessment of Cognitive Control: The Head Center's assessment must include robust measures of Cognitive Reappraisal (CR) ability to differentiate between adaptive control (high-quality Calculating/Deciding) and maladaptive, rigid Constricting-based inhibition.4
     
  • Refine Motivational Coaching: CEF coaching must leverage the SDT dialectic, utilizing the Accepting Driver as the metric for agency.9 Goals should be reframed to guide clients toward Intrinsic Drive (vitality and purpose)24 and foster Meaning-Centered Coping—maintaining assertive effort while accepting external unpredictability.31

 

Integrating this causal, ten-factor Driver architecture and the

diagnostic mechanism of Maladaptive Fusion enables the Core Emotion Framework (CEF) to pinpoint the fundamental cause of psychological deficits, positioning it as the definitive, scientifically rigorous tool for optimal human development.

 

 

Works cited

 

  1. The Core Emotion Framework (CEF), accessed September 30, 2025, https://optimizeyourcapabilities.pro
  2. The Original Unprinted Manuscript Preceding and Shaping the CEF.
  3. The Effects of Cognitive Fusion on Depression in Primary School Principals During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Mediating Role of Psychological Vulnerability and the Moderating Role of Self-Esteem, accessed September 30, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10178906/
  4. Common executive function predicts reappraisal ability but not frequency, accessed September 30, 2025, https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4831&context=soss_research
  5. The role of executive function in cognitive reappraisal: A meta-analytic review - PubMed, accessed September 30, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38869854/
  6. Mind over mood: exploring the executive function's role in downregulation - Frontiers, accessed September 30, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1322055/full
  7. Dreyfus model of skill acquisition - Wikipedia, accessed September 30, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreyfus_model_of_skill_acquisition
  8. Theory - selfdeterminationtheory.org, accessed September 30, 2025, https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/theory/
  9. Self-Determination Theory of Motivation - Center for Community Health & Prevention, accessed September 30, 2025, https://www.urmc.rochester.edu/community-health/patient-care/self-determination-theory
  10. Cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression strategies role in the emotion regulation: an overview on their modulatory effects and neural correlates - Frontiers, accessed September 30, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/systems-neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00175/full
  11. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation | Research Starters - EBSCO, accessed September 30, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/psychology/intrinsic-and-extrinsic-motivation
  12. Cognitive Fusion Mediates the Relationship between Dispositional Mindfulness and Negative Affects: A Study in a Sample of Spanish Children and Adolescent School Students - PubMed Central, accessed September 30, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6926870/
  13. The relationship between cognitive functioning and psychopathology in patients with psychiatric disorders: a transdiagnostic network analysis - PubMed Central, accessed September 30, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9899564/
  14. Cognitive Fusion and Emotional Eating among Adolescents with Obesity: A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Study - MDPI, accessed September 30, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/22/14855
  15. What Is the CASEL Framework?, accessed September 30, 2025, https://casel.org/fundamentals-of-sel/what-is-the-casel-framework/

  16. Functional connectomics of affective and psychotic pathology - PNAS, accessed September 30, 2025, https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1820780116
  17. Steps Towards a Unified Theory of Psychopathology: The Phase Space of Meaning Model - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed September 30, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8629070/
  18. Exposure and Response Prevention in the Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Current Perspectives - PMC, accessed September 30, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6935308/
  19. Comprehensive OCD Treatment Guide: Evidence-Based ERP and Recovery Strategies, accessed September 30, 2025, https://www.psychiatrypodcast.com/psychiatry-psychotherapy-podcast/episode-228-comprehensive-ocd-treatment-guide-evidence-based-erp-and-cognitive-strategies
  20. Exposure and Response Prevention: Facing Fears, Finding Freedom - McLean Hospital, accessed September 30, 2025, https://www.mcleanhospital.org/essential/erp
  21. How Does Acceptance And Commitment Therapy (ACT) Work? - Positive Psychology, accessed September 30, 2025, https://positivepsychology.com/act-acceptance-and-commitment-therapy/
  22. Psychological Flexibility, Chronic Pain, and Health - Annual Reviews, accessed September 30, 2025, https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-psych-020223-124335
  23. Personality Traits and Coping Strategies as Psychological Factors Associated with Health-Related Quality of Life in Highly Sensitive Persons - MDPI, accessed September 30, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/9/5644
  24. Perfectionism vs. Healthy Striving - Centre for Interpersonal Relationships, accessed September 30, 2025, https://cfir.ca/about/blog/perfectionism-vs-healthy-striving/
  25. The Difference Between Perfectionism and Healthy Striving | Eileen Kennedy-Moore, PhD, accessed September 30, 2025, https://eileenkennedymoore.com/article/the-difference-between-perfectionism-and-healthy-striving/
  26. Beyond perfect? A case illustration of working with perfectionism using cognitive behavior therapy - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed September 30, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7689738/
  27. Intrinsic & extrinsic motivation & its impact on organizational performance at Rajkot city: A review, accessed September 30, 2025, https://jmra.in/archive/volume/11/issue/1/article/16027
  28. Self Determination Theory and How It Explains Motivation - Positive Psychology, accessed September 30, 2025, https://positivepsychology.com/self-determination-theory/
  29. Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) - International OCD Foundation, accessed September 30, 2025, https://iocdf.org/about-ocd/treatment/erp/
  30. Psychotherapies and digital interventions for OCD in adults: What do we know, what do we need still to explore?, accessed September 30, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10848818/
  31. Coping styles mediate the association between psychological inflexibility and psychological functioning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A crucial role of meaning-centered coping - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed September 30, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9536873/