Unlocking Human Potential: The Architecture of Peak Capability

 

 

In the relentless pursuit of high performance and organizational excellence, a critical truth has emerged: emotional mastery is not a secondary skill, but the primary driver of superior results.

 

The Core Emotion Framework (CEF) stands as the definitive, architectural response to this necessity, offering a holistic methodology designed to help individuals:

 

• Move beyond their current limits
• Excel further in personal and professional domains
• Achieve peak potential by intentionally modulating their emotional state

 

The Architecture of Peak Human Capability: Emotional Mastery and the Core Emotion Framework

 

The Neuro-Cognitive Blueprint for Capability Optimization

 

1.1. Decoding the Engine of High Performance: Emotional Mastery and the CEF

 

In the relentless pursuit of high performance and organizational excellence, a critical truth has emerged: emotional mastery is not a secondary skill, but the primary neuro-cognitive engine driving superior results and capability optimization. The Core Emotion Framework (CEF) stands as the definitive, architectural response to this necessity, offering a holistic methodology designed to help individuals move beyond their current limits, excel further, and achieve peak potential by intentionally modulating their emotional state.¹

 

The CEF transcends traditional, reactive views of emotion. It is underpinned by and expands upon the foundational Emotion Utilization Model (EUM)—formally defined as "adaptive cognition and action motivated by emotion experience".¹ This deep alignment with evolutionary psychological theories confirms that emotions are inherently motivational, continuously shaping our cognition and subsequent actions to produce the "best reaction in specific situations," crucial for complex human endeavor.² Far from being a mere descriptive taxonomy of feelings, the CEF is conceived as an operational framework for adaptive functioning.

 

It transforms the vague, diffuse reality of internal states into a structured, manageable system, addressing a wide range of developmental challenges without introducing complexity in unrelated functional areas, ultimately aiming for a harmonious, optimized emotional system and genuine psychological flexibility.¹

 

 

1.2. Defining the CEF Operational Mandate

 

The overarching goal of the CEF is to provide practitioners with the means to intentionally manage and modulate their core emotional experiences, enabling them to implement needed changes and achieve optimization. The framework defines a precise structure and a set of ten core emotional processes that, when understood and practiced, can guide individuals toward a better state, regardless of whether they are at the height of success or confronting significant hardships.¹

 

The inherent advantage of the CEF lies in its ability to transform vague, diffuse internal states into distinct, manageable cognitive objects. Prior psychological constructs, such as the basic notion of "Core Affect," define internal experience simply as feeling "good or bad, energized or enervated".³ While accurate, this broad description lacks the necessary granularity for intentional, specific emotional modulation. Emotional agility models require the practitioner to first "Recognize Patterns" and "Label Thoughts" to establish the necessary cognitive distance that prevents being controlled by automatic emotional responses.⁴

 

The CEF provides a proprietary, highly specific nomenclature—the Ten Core Emotions and the Tripartite Centers—which transforms the generalized experience of Core Affect into distinct, identifiable, and actionable psychological phenomena.¹ This linguistic precision elevates the capacity for metacognition, allowing the practitioner to apply executive control more effectively to specific emotional processes rather than struggling against an undifferentiated wave of feeling. Thus, the CEF functions as a high-fidelity internal operating system, significantly accelerating the user's ability to transition from simple emotional awareness to intentional, goal-directed action.

 

 

Section 2: Tripartite Resonance—Mapping Head, Heart, and Gut to the Cognitive-Affective-Conative Continuum

 

The Core Emotion Framework is structured around a Tripartite Structure, conceptualizing core emotional experiences as originating from three interconnected centers: the Head, the Heart, and the Gut.¹ This structure is not merely metaphorical; it is directly supported by established psychological models of human behavior, validating the CEF’s architecture through the lens of empirical science.

 

 

2.1. The Scientific Basis of Multi-Center Decision-Making

 

The psychological model that most directly validates the CEF's structure is the Cognitive-Affective-Conative (CAC) framework, a long-standing dimensional model of attitude and behavior. The CAC model posits that an attitude is composed of three hierarchical and interconnected components: the Cognitive (knowledge/beliefs), the Affective (feelings/emotions), and the Conative (behavioral tendencies/action).⁵ By mapping the CEF’s Tripartite Structure onto this established psychological continuum, the framework moves from a proprietary philosophical concept to a recognized dimensional model of human experience, providing immediate cross-disciplinary validation.

 

 

2.2. The Head Center: Cognition, Choice, and Control

 

The Head Center in the CEF encompasses how individuals perceive, analyze data, and ultimately make choices, recognizing that cognitive functions are intrinsically entangled with emotional experiences.¹

 

 

Psychological and Neuroscientific Correlates

 

This center corresponds precisely to the Cognitive component of attitude models, responsible for logical thinking, in-depth analysis, planning, and sophisticated problem-solving.⁶ The neuroscientific substrate underpinning the Head Center is predominantly the Prefrontal Cortex (PFC).⁷ The PFC is the primary locus for cognitive control and executive functioning, essential for higher-order processes such as analysis, planning, and critically, the ability to adapt to changing environments.¹⁰

 

Furthermore, the PFC plays a key role in delayed gratification by sustaining emotional context over time and organizing behavior toward specific goals.⁸ This neurological capacity is the prerequisite for the Head Center’s core functions within the CEF: Sensing, Calculating, and Deciding. The operational health of the Head Center dictates the clarity and quality of the input data and the resulting judgment.

 

2.3. The Heart Center: Affective Flow and Social Intelligence

 

The Heart Center includes emotions relevant to interpersonal connections, intrapersonal emotional states, and the overall dynamic flow of feelings, emphasizing empathy, introspection, and the management of social dynamics.¹

 

 

Psychological and Neuroscientific Correlates

 

Functionally, the Heart Center aligns with the Affective component of the CAC model, focusing specifically on feelings and emotional responses to a given situation or interaction.⁵ It represents the emotional core of decision-making, where compassion, empathy, or even fear guide choices to align with an individual’s deeper values and long-term objectives.¹¹

 

Neuroscientifically, the Heart Center is associated with the Limbic System, the set of brain structures involved in emotional processing and motivation.¹² More specifically, its role as the integrator of emotional flow is mapped to the Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC). The ACC holds a unique position, acting as a functional bridge between the emotional limbic system and the cognitive prefrontal cortex. This makes the ACC a critical hub for affect regulation—the ability to control and manage emotions—and thus, the integration of logic and emotion.¹³ The optimal functioning of the Heart Center is paramount for achieving Emotional Agility, which requires the individual to "Accept Experience" and allow emotions to flow without suppressing them or succumbing to rumination.⁴ A healthy Heart Center ensures that the emotional signals informing action are processed and integrated effectively, preparing the individual for the action required by the Gut Center.

 

 

2.4. The Gut Center: Conation, Motivation, and Commitment

 

The Gut Center is conceptualized as the seat of action and motivation, governing the emotions that propel individuals forward, provide feelings of satisfaction, and signal the essential necessity for rest and recovery.¹

 

 

Psychological and Neuroscientific Correlates

 

This center maps directly to the Conative or Behavioral component of psychological models, which describes the influence an attitude or affective state has on specific actions and behaviors.⁵ The Gut Center is the driver of output, dictating critical behavioral intentions, such as goal initiation and commitment.⁶

 

The action-oriented function of the Gut Center is supported by its neuroscientific linkage to the brain’s primary reward circuitry, namely the Ventral Striatum, which includes the Nucleus Accumbens (often termed the limbic striatum).¹² These structures are central to motivation and reward pathways, receiving strong projections from affective regulation centers, such as the subgenual Anterior Cingulate Cortex (sACC).¹³

 

The structure of the CAC model suggests a hierarchical relationship where the Affective image (Heart) precedes and positively influences the Conative image (Gut).⁶ This structural relationship reinforces the CEF methodology: successful optimization of emotional states (Heart) is required for the consistent generation of effective, measurable behaviors (Gut).

 

By targeting and optimizing the Gut Center emotions (Arranging, Appreciating, Boosting), the CEF focuses on directly influencing the Conative Image, resulting in palpable, positive behavioral outcomes. This supports empirical findings in organizational psychology that indicate executive coaching is most effective in producing change in observable behavioral and cognitive-behavioral activities.¹⁴ The CEF thus serves as a predictive behavioral tool, optimizing internal emotional states to guarantee specific, motivated external action.

 

 

Section 3: Deconstructing the Ten Core Emotions—The Science of Actionable Processes

 

The power of the CEF methodology is realized through the intentional management of its ten distinct Core Emotions, each presented as an actionable process.¹ These emotions are not arbitrary labels but highly refined, proprietary definitions of established psychological mechanisms, offering practitioners a precise vocabulary for sophisticated self-regulation.

 

 

3.1. The Cognitive Axis (Head Center): Perception, Analysis, and Clarity

 

The three core emotions of the Head Center provide the structure for effective intake, processing, and resolution.

 

 

1. Sensing: Initial Perception and Awareness

 

Sensing is defined as the ability to send and receive raw factors, emotions, or intensities—it is the initial perception and active information gathering process.¹ This process is the psychological analog of assessing Core Affect³ and aligns with the foundational awareness components required in mindfulness-based interventions, where non-judgmental observation of internal experience is paramount.¹⁵ High-quality Sensing is indispensable for establishing an accurate baseline reality, which is the starting point for effective goal attainment in standard coaching methodologies.¹⁶

 

 

2. Calculating: In-depth Analysis

 

Calculating involves performing various forms of analysis, from data processing to puzzle resolution.¹ This process directly maps onto the psychological mechanism of Cognitive Reappraisal—the effort to reinterpret a situation to alter its emotional impact.¹⁵ Effective calculation requires the practitioner to "Zoom out" to contextualize the situation in time, and "Flip the frame" to explore alternative positive or neutral perspectives.¹⁷ The ability to execute Calculating allows the individual to shift from an automatic emotional reaction (limbic system) to an adaptive cognitive modulation (PFC function), thereby governing the nature and intensity of the resultant emotion.⁹

 

 

3. Deciding: Clarity of Choice

 

Deciding is the process of making conclusions based on the interaction between logic and emotion, resulting in clarity of choice, the setting of priorities, and the formulation of a path forward.¹ This function represents the culmination of PFC-mediated executive function. It necessitates the integration of objective data processed during Calculating (Head) with personal values and relational needs identified by the Heart Center.¹¹ Deciding is the critical internal step that transitions analytic thought into directed action, providing the necessary guidance for the Gut Center to commit resources.

 

 

3.2. The Relational Axis (Heart Center): Dynamics of Connection and Boundaries

 

The emotions of the Heart Center govern the individual’s interaction with the external world and the management of their personal internal space.

 

 

4. Expanding: Fostering Relationships

 

Expanding embraces openness, inclusivity, and broad perspectives, fueled by empathy.¹ This emotion is a foundational requirement for building positive relationships, one of the core elements necessary for achieving overall well-being and flourishing.¹⁸ It represents the fundamental willingness to be present and non-judgemental—the key openness component of Psychological Flexibility.¹⁹

 

 

5. Constricting: Introspection and Boundaries

 

Constricting is defined as the intentional tendency toward exactness or restrictiveness, utilized for introspection, setting boundaries, and refining personal understanding.¹ This process serves the essential function of adaptive self-regulation, providing the necessary focus and internal withdrawal required to consolidate energy and prevent diffusion caused by excessive Expanding.

 

 

6. Achieving: Navigating Interactions and Self-Efficacy

 

Achieving involves juggling roles and responsibilities with a sense of self-importance and pride.¹ This emotion is intrinsically linked to Generalized Self-Efficacy, the belief in one's ability to succeed, and aligns with the Accomplishment element of well-being.¹⁸ High levels of achieving emotion are correlated with positive performance outcomes and are an essential component of the growth process.²³

 

 

3.3. The Action Axis (Gut Center): Motivation, Reinforcement, and Completion

 

The emotions of the Gut Center are designed to propel action, establish commitment, and manage the psychological resources required for sustained performance.

 

 

7. Arranging: Taking Control and Action

 

Arranging encompasses prioritizing, organizing, defending, and initiating action toward goals.¹ This emotion manifests the behavioral component of goal setting and execution. It represents the psychological principle of an internal Locus of Control—the perception that outcomes are attributable to one's own efforts—which is a defining feature of positive Core Self-Evaluations (CSE).²² In practical coaching terms, Arranging translates to the ability to define clear, directed actions necessary for goal attainment.¹⁶

 

 

8. Appreciating: Positive Reinforcement

 

Appreciating is the act of praising and enjoying, leading to feelings of satisfaction, gratitude, and positive reinforcement.¹ This emotion functions as the critical emotional feedback loop necessary for consolidating learning and reinforcing positive behaviors, directly supporting the Positive Emotions element of well-being.¹⁸ The intentional cultivation of Appreciating reinforces the positive self-perception inherent in developing strong Core Self-Evaluations.²²

 

 

9. Boosting: Fostering Stability and Commitment

 

Boosting involves fostering stability, commitment, and action, providing the necessary energizing emotions that drive individuals toward objectives.¹ This core emotion functions as the internal development of psychological capital, directly enhancing resilience and commitment—outcomes demonstrably improved through executive coaching interventions.¹⁴ Boosting serves as the emotional counterpoint to high neuroticism (low emotional stability), which is a key negative indicator often associated with lower performance.²²

 

 

10. Accepting: Serenity, Rest, and Recovery

 

Accepting embraces acceptance and serenity, involving letting go, recognizing limitations, and signaling the necessary need for rest and recovery.¹ This is a central, non-negotiable tenet of effective self-management. Psychologically, Accepting is the core mechanism of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT), a framework designed to build psychological flexibility.²⁴ The ability to accept an experience allows the individual to defuse from unhelpful, rigid thoughts and prevents the ruminative loops associated with cognitive rigidity. By mastering Accepting, the practitioner ensures sustainable energy management and maintains alignment with their core values.⁴

 

 

Tactical Development of Core Self-Evaluations

 

The integration of the Gut Center emotions provides a tactical pathway for developing robust Core Self-Evaluations (CSE). CSE, defined by high self-esteem, internal locus of control, generalized self-efficacy, and emotional stability (low neuroticism), is an integrative, high-level trait highly predictive of mental health and superior performance.²² While traits are often viewed as stable, research shows that targeted coaching can produce positive change even on relatively stable dimensions.¹⁴ The CEF operationalizes this change: the Gut Center provides specific, repeatable cognitive-behavioral activities—such as generating Arranging behaviors to increase internal locus of control, utilizing Achieving to demonstrate self-efficacy, and employing Boosting to maintain emotional stability—that directly reinforce the components of CSE. Thus, the CEF provides practitioners with a level of process granularity that transforms an abstract goal (improving self-concept) into a daily, tactical emotional practice.

 

 

Section 4: The Methodology of Emotional Mastery—Adaptive Cycling and Psychological Flexibility

 

The operational effectiveness of the CEF resides in its methodology for dynamic emotional management, known as Adaptive Emotional Cycling.

 

 

4.1. The Mechanism of Adaptive Emotional Cycling

 

Adaptive Emotional Cycling is defined as the intentional navigation through different core emotional states to achieve specific goals. The framework proposes that practitioners can intentionally activate or modulate corresponding core emotions by utilizing specific "cycling points"—internally imagined energetic movements (such as clockwise, counter-clockwise, swinging, or inward spiraling).¹

 

This methodology is a sophisticated, internalized application of the psychological construct of Emotion Regulation (ER). ER is defined as the ability to influence which emotions are felt, when they are felt, and how they are experienced or expressed.¹⁵ The developmental studies of emotion regulation consistently link this critical life skill to the recruitment of prefrontal brain regions associated with cognitive control and executive functioning.⁹ Adaptive Emotional Cycling provides a standardized, conscious set of techniques (the imagined movements) designed to deliberately engage the cognitive control systems of the PFC to modulate emotional input, thereby improving the efficiency and appropriateness of emotional responses.

 

 

4.2. Intentionality and the Practice of Flexibility

 

The core objective of utilizing Adaptive Emotional Cycling is the active, intentional modulation of internal states, which is the functional definition of Psychological Flexibility (PF).¹⁹ Psychological flexibility encompasses a wide range of human capabilities, including the ability to recognize and successfully adapt to various situational demands and to shift mindsets or behavioral repertoires when current strategies compromise personal or social functioning.

 

The necessity of this skill is highlighted by research indicating that low psychological flexibility is a robust predictor of adverse outcomes, including elevated anxiety, depression, pervasive pathology, lower quality of life, and poor work performance.²⁴

 

CEF’s cycling methodology institutionalizes the practice of PF, serving as the direct counter-mechanism to detrimental cognitive rigidity.¹⁰ The internal cycling points serve as cognitive mechanisms—anchors utilized to deliberately initiate a shift in PFC engagement patterns, effectively moving the individual out of fixed, rigid, or rumination-driven emotional loops.²¹ By providing a structured, repeatable method for conscious emotional state transition, the CEF ensures that psychological flexibility becomes a trained, rather than accidental, capability.

 

 

4.3. Reframing the Method of Engagement

 

The process of engaging with the CEF recognizes the complexity of individual development. The methodology of engagement exists on a continuum, ranging from simple passive reflection or a quick review for encouragement, to gentle meditation, and for others, demanding "continuous and vigorous practice" until the core emotions function independently and interact harmoniously.¹

 

This flexible approach to implementation mirrors best practices in professional development and implementation science. Effective implementation models, such as the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) Framework, emphasize the necessity of involving stakeholders at all levels and stages of the process to ensure adoption and sustainability.²⁶ By allowing the practitioner to tailor the depth and intensity of engagement, the CEF maximizes relevance and reduces the internal barriers to adoption, making the system accessible to individuals at any point in their professional journey.¹

 

 

Section 5: CEF as a High-Impact Development Tool—Implementation and Organizational Efficacy

 

5.1. Positioning CEF in Executive and Professional Coaching

 

Executive coaching has been proven to be a powerful developmental tool, generating significant positive change, particularly in behavioral outcomes, self-efficacy, resilience, and psychological capital.¹⁴ The CEF is uniquely positioned to enhance these outcomes because its ten core emotions are explicitly defined as actionable processes.¹

 

While successful, widely adopted coaching models, such as the GROW (Goals, Reality, Options, Will) and OSKAR (Outcome, Scale, Know-how, Affirmation, Action, Review) frameworks, provide essential external structural roadmaps for goal setting and problem resolution¹⁶, they often require the coachee to possess a high degree of internal emotional awareness and self-management capabilities. The CEF fills this critical gap by providing the necessary internal operating language and process granularity required to effectively navigate the 'Reality' or leverage the 'Know-how' elements of traditional models. By mastering CEF’s internal regulation system, a coach can diagnose precisely which emotional process (e.g., a failure in Sensing or a deficiency in Boosting) is preventing successful Arranging (Action/Will). This linkage provides coaches with a sophisticated diagnostic and prescriptive tool that focuses on the internal landscape dictating commitment, motivation, and sustained behavioral change, thereby amplifying the effectiveness of existing coaching practices.

 

 

5.2. Principles for Organizational Adoption and Sustainability

 

For the CEF to achieve widespread professional adoption, its implementation must be guided by principles derived from implementation science, ensuring a structured approach to planning, execution, and evaluation^.26

 

 

Systemic Coherence

 

Successful adoption requires that the CEF be integrated systemically, building comprehensive frameworks that align with existing organizational development strategies. Analogous to successful models used in teacher professional learning, the framework must support systemic coherence and be woven into the fabric of leadership and development programs to ensure impact and sustainability. This approach requires utilizing organizational partnership models to build aligned conditions and services across multiple levels of a system.²⁸

 

 

Clear Metrics and Evaluation

 

Although the CEF focuses on internal emotional processes, its explicit link to the Conative/Action Axis (Gut Center) ensures that implementation success can be externally measured. The framework enables the tracking of measurable behavioral outcomes, such as improved goal attainment derived from effective Arranging and Achieving behaviors. Furthermore, the robust alignment between CEF practices and high-value psychological constructs allows for the use of scientifically validated instruments, such as the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ 2) for Psychological Flexibility²⁴ or measures of Core Self-Evaluations²², to rigorously evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention and assess the psychological capital gains achieved through CEF practice.¹⁴

 

 

Conclusions: The Evolutionary Advantage of Emotional Architecture

 

The Core Emotion Framework represents a powerful evolution in self-development methodology, transforming the often ambiguous and overwhelming domain of human emotion into a structured, actionable architectural system.

 

The validation of the CEF’s proprietary structure rests firmly on its congruence with established scientific models. The Tripartite Structure of Head, Heart, and Gut is robustly supported by the Cognitive-Affective-Conative (CAC) psychological model and is anatomically mapped onto the corresponding neuroscientific circuitry: the Prefrontal Cortex (Head, Executive Function), the Limbic System/ACC (Heart, Affect Regulation), and the Ventral Striatum (Gut, Motivation/Action). This meticulous mapping confirms that CEF is not an abstract concept but a functional interface designed to align with the brain's natural decision-making and motivation pathways.

 

The framework's core strength lies in its transformation of diffuse emotional states into ten precise, actionable processes. This transformation enables the practitioner to master Psychological Flexibility through the methodical practice of Adaptive Emotional Cycling. By providing specific, proprietary language for internal experience, the CEF accelerates metacognition, allowing for the precise calibration of affective resources and ensuring that the necessary cognitive-behavioral activities are performed to build foundational psychological resources, such as Core Self-Evaluations.

 

Ultimately, the Core Emotion Framework offers practitioners, leaders, and coaches an unparalleled tool for self-optimization. By demystifying the internal emotional landscape and replacing rigidity with intentional, adaptive emotional navigation, the CEF delivers a definitive operational advantage, driving superior capability, enhanced resilience, and consistent behavioral performance across all domains of professional engagement.

 

 

Works cited

 

1. OptimizeYourCapabilities.pro, accessed October 20, 2025, http://www.optimizeyourcapabilities.pro
2. Basic Emotions or Constructed Emotions: Insights From Taking an Evolutionary Perspective - PMC - PubMed Central, accessed October 20, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12065949/
3. Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion - PubMed, accessed October 20, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12529060/
4. What Is Emotional Agility? A Comprehensive Framework for Workplace Success, accessed October 20, 2025, https://www.sqcentre.com/blog/what-is-emotional-agility-a-comprehensive-framework-for-workplace-success/
5. Cognitive, Affective, or Conative? #PMInc - Personalized Marketing Inc, accessed October 20, 2025, https://personalizedmarketing.info/cognitive-affective-or-conative/
6. Cognitive image, affective image, cultural dimensions, and conative image: A new conceptual framework - Frontiers, accessed October 20, 2025, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.935814/full
7. The Science Behind the 3 Brains — The Head, Heart and Gut - Düng, accessed October 20, 2025, https://www.dungsnacks.com/blogs/the-dung-daily/the-science-behind-the-3-brains-the-head-heart-and-gut
8. Affective neuroscience - Wikipedia, accessed October 20, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affective_neuroscience
9. The Neuroscience of Emotion Regulation Development: Implications for Education - PMC, accessed October 20, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5096655/

10. Cognitive Rigidity: Causes, Symptoms & How to Overcome - My LA Therapy, accessed October 20, 2025, https://mylatherapy.com/cognitive-rigidity-understanding-the-causes-symptoms-effects-and-how-to-build-cognitive-flexibility/

11. The Three Musketeers of Decision-Making: Head, Heart & Gut | Beverly Landais, accessed October 20, 2025, https://www.beverlylandais.co.uk/blog/the-three-musketeers-of-decision-making-head-heart-gut
12. Limbic system - Wikipedia, accessed October 20, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limbic_system
13. Anterior Cingulate Cortex: Unique Role in Cognition and Emotion | The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences - Psychiatry Online, accessed October 20, 2025, https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/jnp.23.2.jnp121
14. The effects of executive coaching on behaviors, attitudes, and personal characteristics: a meta-analysis of randomized control trial studies - PMC, accessed October 20, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10272735/
15. Emotional Regulation: 5 Evidence-Based Regulation Techniques - Positive Psychology, accessed October 20, 2025, https://positivepsychology.com/emotion-regulation/
16. 10 Coaching Models & Styles To Use in the Workplace (in 2025) - AIHR, accessed October 20, 2025, https://www.aihr.com/blog/coaching-models/
17. Cognitive Reappraisal: The Art of Seeing Things Differently - Ness Labs, accessed October 20, 2025, https://nesslabs.com/cognitive-reappraisal
18. The PERMA Model: Your Scientific Theory of Happiness - Positive Psychology, accessed October 20, 2025, https://positivepsychology.com/perma-model/
19. accessed October 20, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2998793/#:~:text=Psychological%20flexibility%20spans%20a%20wide,open%2C%20and%20committed%20to%20behaviors
20. Rigidity (psychology) - Wikipedia, accessed October 20, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rigidity_(psychology)
21. Rigid Thinking and Rational Living Don't Work Well Together - Albert Ellis Institute, accessed October 20, 2025, https://albertellis.org/2016/01/rigid-thinking-and-rational-living-dont-work-well-together/

22. Core Self-Evaluations and Work Success, accessed October 20, 2025, https://www.wku.edu/cebs/doctorate/documents/readings/judge_2009_core_self-evaluations.pdf

23. The relationship between core self-evaluation and cognitive failure in Chinese adolescents: the sequential mediating role of alexithymia and depression - PMC, accessed October 20, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11966809/
24. What is Psychological Flexibility? - Working with ACT, accessed October 20, 2025, https://workingwithact.com/what-is-act/what-is-psychological-flexibility/
25. The Technique That Slays Rumination - Psychology Today, accessed October 20, 2025, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-truth-about-exercise-addiction/202508/the-technique-that-slays-rumination
26. Theories, Models, & Frameworks - Implementation Science at UW, accessed October 20, 2025, https://impsciuw.org/implementation-science/research/frameworks/

27. Implementing learning into practice from continuous professional development activities: a scoping review of health professionals' views and experiences, accessed October 20, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11414194/

28. Measuring Teacher Professional Learning Case Studies - Annenberg Institute at Brown University, accessed October 20, 2025, https://annenberg.brown.edu/sites/default/files/Measuring%20Teacher%20Professional%20Learning%20Case%20Studies.pdf